Tuesday, January 23, 2018

SLC News: 1/23/18

Two bits.

Here is one post from BeavisandButthead.com that summarizes The Man on White Horse Syndrome as it is manifested as Trump Fanboyism.

All Trump has to do is release one thirty second video ad against illegal immigration (nothing about legal immigration, mind you), and he is suddenly “officially our guy, he was always our guy.”  Talk about low standards.  How about waiting for Trump to actually do something before sweatily declaring your undying allegiance to the fat-draped obese porn star-screwing with no protection then home to wifey vulgar ignorant buffoon Trump?  Yeah, yeah, MAGA and all that.  

And by the way, why must we exchange DACA amnesty even for an end to chain migration and the other goodies?  How about we both deport the Nightmarers and do all these other Millerite agenda items?  That would be a real MAGA indeed.

Morgan of Counter-Currents, who is insofar as I know still living in Hungary without being ethnically Hungarian writes:

Bucur is right to praise Germany for its willingness to spend billions to bring their kin home, to a safer place. This is the sort of ethnic consciousness that we, as European identitarians, should extend not only to our own ethnic kin but to all those of European descent in this time of crisis. Germany stood up for its own. The failing of the contrasting approach is exemplified by the actions of the Romanian Communists: out of bigotry and the desire for short-term material gains, they were willing to turn their backs on their German countrymen rather than attempt to address their problems…

But, hey, I thought you guys were all ethnonationalists?  Doesn’t that mean Germans live in Germany and Romanians in Romania?  Why should there be Germans in Romania, considered as the Romanians’ “countrymen” unless your “ethnonationalism” really is the ethnoimperialism I suspect it is?  I guess those cringing subhuman hora-dancing Gypsy Romanians should consider themselves lucky to be colonized by Germans, right?

Monday, January 22, 2018

Behold the Female: Expired Shelf Life

Rotting yeast.

My problems with the gamesters is essentially one of prescription, not description.  With respect to sexual matters, the game crowd are correct in their fundamental analysis.

For example, Johnny Redux:

A sexless marriage, in many (if not most) cases, is the result of a man marrying a woman his own age, and after time losing all sexual interest in her as she quickly morphs into an old woman before his eyes, much quicker than he is aging.

As they say: when a man gets older, he looks more and more like Sean Connery, and when a woman gets older she looks more and more like….Sean Connery.

Indeed, one wonders how much of the retroactive outrage pouring out from #MeToo past-their-prime yeastbuckets is due to the bitterness of aging, sagging hags, who have all the charm of rotting meat and all the grace of a wilted flower, looking back with desperate longing to the days when men actually found them attractive - before the inexorable ravages of time worked to make milady into a pathetic and pitiful shell of her former self.  Unlike Dorian Gray, it’s the woman herself, not her portrait, which decays with every passing day, to the dismay of every man who looks, disapprovingly, upon her.

Some good advice for (White) women: gain some humility, marry and have children in your 20s, suppress your urge to hypergamy, and cultivate a pleasant personality so you will be tolerable when your looks fade (which will occur sooner rather than later). You’ll want to have something to fall back upon when you hit the wall, other than the love of a good cat.

The connection between sexual behavior and EGI should be, I hope, obvious to the reader.  We are, after all, a sexually reproducing species.

Sunday, January 21, 2018

Meet Chad Crowley: Anti-White Activist

Another Type I fetishist.

I am postponing the post originally scheduled for today, to make some brief comments about Chad Crowley, the latest Type I Alt Righter who regurgitates warmed over Kempism, deluded that some novel insights are being made.

Crowley’s all-too-familiar, and, from a general “movement” standpoint, boringly repetitive and grossly unimaginative, ramblings on Rome are both non-historical as well as anti-scientific (*).

I know I’ve seen the name “Chad Crowley” before, and a cursory search brings up sweaty mumbling about “Indo-Europeans” that laughably accepts Gunther as some sort of serious scholar, instead of the embarrassing crank that he was, at Beavis-and-Butthead.com, and we can also observe more juvenile Alt Right nonsense at Counter-Currents.  Let’s examine a piece about “Viking Superman” (of course).  Emphasis added:
Viking — the word itself still conjures up the stereotypical image of bloodthirsty blonde barbarians, whose rage can only be sated by acts of pillage and rapine. Fortunately, this dated historical perspective has been somewhat revised, and establishment historians now tacitly acknowledge that Norse civilization was much more complex than previously thought, and a lot less one-dimensional. 

If only Der Movement could consider the history of Rome and the rest of the Classical World, as well as that of “modern” Southern Europe, in a manner that is “much more complex” and “a lot less one-dimensional.” Alas, that would entail some original thinking and a break with fossilized dogma (blasphemy) so such revised “historical perspective” will not be forthcoming from the babbling zombies of “movement” discourse.
If you are familiar with any of my writings, you’ll know that I firmly advocate the study and superimposition of past historical experiences onto present circumstances. Julius Evola

Who was of course a non-Indo-European, non-White, subhuman mongrel (which doesn’t prevent the Type I crowd from being fascinated with Evola and his insipid ramblings)
…presents my view of the usefulness of history succinctly when he posits that exploration of the past isn’t done for the ghoulish resurrection of long-dead peoples or cultures, but rather for the perennial spirit that animates and gives life to both. 

Or to engage in the usual “movement” ethnic fetishism.
The Vikings were many things — warriors, poets, explorers, statesmen — and in the dark days to come, I can think of no better “spirit” to invoke and study than that of our intrepid and oft-misunderstood Norse brethren. Like White Nationalism, Norse culture and the ‘Viking Age’ are still a sadly misunderstood phenomena, and this makes their examination all the more relevant. 
The Roman period, particularly the Later Western Roman Empire, is still “a sadly misunderstood” period (misunderstood by Nutzi nitwits); I plan to read up on that period and eventually share my insights here (which you should not read if disagreement with “movement” dogma gives you fainting fits).
Furthermore, for centuries the Vikings were feared and hated by their non-Norse contemporaries, and later despised by generations of the anti-White academic establishment. All of this has only changed within the past several decades. What does this tell us? It illustrates that like our Viking kin, we White Nationalists will too someday be vindicated retrospectively, because nature favors the victorious, and our cause is glorious.

Please don’t say “we White nationalists.” I neither consider you a White nationalist nor part of “we.”
The White/European predisposition for heterodox thinking
Oh, the irony!  Someone who parrots decades of rigidly fossilized “movement” dogma with nary an original thought anywhere to be found talks about the “White/European predisposition for heterodox thinking.”
… is rooted in our people’s unique ethno- and evolutionary history. The great prophet of decline Oswald Spengler

Who would vehemently disagree with the bulk of your writing, including the confusion of Apollonian with Faustian.
...speculated that the Nordic (Aryan/Indo-European/European) soul was forged in the “harder struggling” environs of the “Nordic steppe,” and though I am not an environmental determinist, I would hold that this is partially true.[4] In the early Indo-European world, and even later in the Norse world of the Viking Age, the love of competition, permeated by the struggle of low-intensity conflict and in conjunction with the extreme climes of Northern Europe, gave birth to an inegalitarian and hierarchical society of aristocratic-warriors and heroic individuals. 
At the same time, the HBD-Nordicists tell us that Germanic Northwest Europeans are egalitarian altruistic universalists, uniquely helpless against immigration, being descended from “high trust hunter gatherers” who evolved in "the extreme climes of Northern Europe."  The fact that these internally inconsistent views cause no cognitive dissonance is clear evidence that we are not dealing with rational analysis, but with a form of secularized religious faith.

These individuals favored deed and action over the pettiness of mere physical existence and material comfort. The cumulative tempering effect of all of these forces gave shape to the White/European man, whose desire to transcend the biological and the material…
That coming from someone who is a biological-minded materialist, albeit one peddling pseudoscience.
…whose penchant for a grounded abstract, became a proclivity for transcendence through self-overcoming. The White race’s ability to think clearly and creatively, harnessing our inner ‘Faustian’ nature has always been our people’s greatest strength, and we would be wise to continue to harness that which has always made us strong. 

As White Nationalists…
Crowley is an anti-White activist, not a White nationalist (see below).
..we’ve dedicated ourselves to representing the highest, most transcendent attributes of our race, and the utilization of our ‘Faustian’ spirit in the service of a cause greater than our individual egos should be one of our greatest ideals. Ernst J√ľnger proclaimed that the underlying principle of the modern world is the centrality of pain. By experiencing and embracing hardship we have much in common with our Viking and Indo-European ancestors, and as such possess the potential for yet-undreamed-of greatness. 
Such greatness not manifested by the likes of Crowley.
Adolf Hitler once said that the Aryan “is the Prometheus of mankind” and I can conjure up no better epithet to describe the collective awesomeness intrinsic to our blood.
“Collective awesomeness.”  Cue cries of Pepe!  And Hail Kek!

Crowley is just another run-of-the mill, dime-a-dozen ethnic fetishist; same old, same old. By peddling distortions and untruths to divide Whites against themselves, Crowley does the dirty work of the System, and therefore can be considered a dedicated anti-White activist, not a White nationalist.

Sadly, The Occidental Observer has degenerated into a highbrow version of Chateau Heartiste, being a mix of Trump fanboyism, HBD pseudoscience, Nordicism, and juvenile AltRightism. More evidence that Der Movement, Inc. corrupts everything it comes in contact with, including otherwise intelligent and well individuals (TOO blog founders, not necessarily all of the contributors).

*Further, looking at Novembre’s “genes mirror geography” study, we can see that Italian samples, derived from various parts of that nation, fall exactly where one would expect given the geographic cline of gene frequencies.  There is no significant shift, as one would expect if the population base of the nation had been significantly replaced by others from origins outside the European genetic cline.

Saturday, January 20, 2018

SLC News: More Type I Retardation

More stupidity.


Really?  You think?  Pepe!  Hail Kek!


And this is a formerly unknown Beavis-and-Butthead episode.

Altright.com runs an article about the migrant invasion of Palermo, and the response in the comments section is what is to be expected.  Cue the crazed fetishists:


NineNorth
Southern Italy has a mongrel problem, the North is where it’s at. At this point Sicily’s been invaded by everyone at some point. #MakeSicilyNormanAgain 
Cryptic

All of Italy has had a mongrel problem since the original population stopped having enough children to replace themselves during the jewish banking enlightenment.
Show me an “Italian” that isn’t a greasy guinea. A katzenfresser.

Ah yes, but those euronigger cat eaters are not the ones who wrecked Europe with the invited migrant invasion, were they? That was Marmeladinger Merkel and her nation of cucked soyboys.

In any case, how about actually commenting on the topic of the article itself? After all, we can’t all be as purebred as this Aryan ubermensch.  #MakeBromstadChineseAgain

Ethnic fetishism alert.  More warmed over Kempian nonsense to keep you laughing. These are the same websites that huff and puff hysterically about “high trust hunter gatherers” and the Paleolithic/Neolithic divide. Newsflash: Italy was predominantly Neolithic, racially speaking, from the…Neolithic, which predates the “Bronze Age.”  Yes, I know… the early Roman Republic, chaste and noble, was populated by a bunch of Dolph Lundgrens wearing togas. And those Etruscans, from 5th century BC north-central Italy were, undoubtedly, Nordic Aryans.  No doubt about it.  Newsflash #2 – if you are going to talk about morality, then the moral fiber of the Christian Late Western Roman Empire was at a higher level than that of the Early Empire shenanigans of Tiberius, Caligula, or Nero, or of the Republic period featuring such upstanding character studies as Pierce’s favorite, Sulla the Queer.

Speaking of degeneration, The Occidental Observer is vying with Counter-Currents and VDARE for the biggest downturn in material quality, rapidly becoming an embarrassment.  It’s another empty suit website, in a “movement” defied by “empty suits.”  Another website to erase from my reading list.

Note the hypocrisy and inconsistency here.  On the one hand, we are told that Northwest Europeans welcome migrants because they are descended from “high trust hunter gatherers” and are a noble and honest people whose civilization-building altruism is being exploited by the migrant invaders – as opposed to clannish and collectivist Neolithic Southern Europeans who are not so exploited.  Then, on the other hand, if the mayor of Palermo welcomes migrants, it’s because S. Italians are subhuman mongrels who are markedly inferior to all else, including N. Italian Lega Nord heroes (including Bossi and his obviously N. Italian wife), and thus are too degenerate to mount a resistance to migrants.  That the “movement” lacks the self-awareness to keep the story straight from one day to the next is Sailer’s “Who Whom” in stark relief – the same behavior is judged differently dependent on who it is that does it.  That degree of extreme ethnocentrism is not exactly very “high trust altruist Universalist” is it?  It’s more like the behavior of Jews.

Doesn’t Der Movement ever get tired of endlessly spouting the same solipsist dogma?  Here’s a challenge for all the Type I heroes of Der Movement: can you have an article – how about one single article, just one - about Italy, Greece, or Spain without endless comments about how “mongrelized” the populations are?  Or an article about Rome without the usual nonsense about “racial degeneration” leading to “decadence?”  If you guys are so racially superior certainly you can have sufficient self-discipline to refrain from the usual song-and-dance for one article, right?  It’s not like you’re like a raging alcoholic with a bottle of whisky within arm’s length.  Right?

Given we are dealing with affirmative action quota queens, whose only “merit” for “movement activism” or “movement leadership” is their caste system ethnicity, the same heroes who have led us all to endless decades of unremitting failure, who make the same man on white horse error over and over again – being more unable to learn from errors than the most primitive Negro, and whose “extreme vetting” at meetings is akin to Merkel’s border control policy, it’s doubtful that any of these would have the slightest discipline whatsoever to do anything.

Greg Johnson promotes “paternalism” –

Paternalism means treating people like children. Children lack the maturity and wisdom to make their own decisions. Thus they need parents — or people playing the paternal role — to tell them what to do and, on occasion, to force them to do it.

Let’s rewrite that.


Paternalism means treating incompetent, child-like “activists” like children. Children lack the maturity and wisdom to make their own decisions.  They’ll host “extreme vetted” meetings at which one infiltrator is snapping secret pictures (and making speeches to beware of infiltrators) and another infiltrator is running a tape recorder in his carry case.  Thus they need parents — or Type II activists playing the paternal role — to tell them what to do and, on occasion, to force them to do it, at which point these children will throw a tantrum and slam the door to their room in a hysterical fit.

By the way, who decides what the “good life” is?  I would assume that Andrew Joyce would think one thing and James O’ Meara and his “mannerbund” quite another.  Or is the “good life” simply that of living off of supporters’ donations?

I admit to failing in my task of sufficiently critically evaluating Der Movement. I’ve been far too lenient, far too uncritical, far too accommodating.  But that’s a lost cause anyway.  More important is not to be merely reactive but to articulate an alternative. Creating such content – even if it is inevitably ignored by idiots and rent-seeking graspers – is a better use of time than listening to the equivalent of Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering, reading sweaty fetishists, or watching tin cup panhandling.

Friday, January 19, 2018

Racial Envy Once Again

More on racial envy.


The Hutu have always resented the tall, imposing, attractive Tutsis, who had dominated them on-and-off since the 15th century. When Hutus picked up machetes to slash to bits nearly a million of their Tutsi neighbors in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, they were, on a deeper level, contends Richburg, “slashing at their own perceived ugliness, as if destroying this thing of beauty, this thing they could never really attain, removing it from the earth forever.”

That is very similar to what I’ve written about before on racial resentment and racial envy. The bottom line is that much of anti-White animus has its genesis in envy of Whites, White accomplishments, and White characteristics. Separation would help, but with globalism, there’s probably no way for non-Whites to fully escape feelings of racial inadequacy.  But at least Whites won’t have such resentful and embittered people living amongst us.


Thursday, January 18, 2018

More SLC News: Trump, Obesity, Porn, and Chinatrices

More, more, more.




Wow, what an “alpha!”  Cue Roissy’s fawning admiration.

Remember when Roissy predicted that Bezos was going to turn “hard right” politically because he was working out?  

Der Movement in all its forms – always wrong.  Ted Sallis – always right.


As far as The Good Shepherd goes, see this.

It’s interesting, and ironic, that generational warriors with their rage against “boomers” behave like stereotypes of jackass Millennials.  The bible verse about motes, eyes, and beams comes to mind.

Optimal diplomatic relations along the Silk Road.  Get some!

Contrary to the Asian supremacist-White omega male yellow fever sexual masochism fundamental dishonesty of the Silkers, the reality is of Jewish-Chinese collaboration against White interests.
U.S. officials warned Jared Kushner earlier this year that his friendship with Wendi Deng Murdoch could be used as a conduit by the Chinese government, The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

Unnamed sources told the outlet that counterintelligence officials had warned Kushner that Murdoch, a Chinese-American businesswoman who was married to News Corp. founder Rupert Murdoch, could leverage her close relationship with Kushner and his wife, Ivanka Trump, to push the interests of the Chinese government. 

The Wall Street Journal is owned by News Corp.

Among U.S. officials’ reported concerns was a proposed garden in Washington, D.C., funded by the Chinese government. The $100 million project has reportedly been declared a national security risk due to a tall tower that’s part of the design, which intelligence officials worry could be used for surveillance.

Note also how the Chinese utilize their women to influence White and Jewish males to help “to push the interests of the Chinese government. “  Sound familiar?

Not a Romanian.  Surprise!  Who has been warning you about the Asian invasion?

Sallis right again, and again, and again…endlessly, until the rightness of Sallis overcomes Der Movement and Silker lying mendacity.


Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Genetic Structure and Altruistic Self-Sacrifice

A more precise accounting is required.

We are all aware of Haldane’s oft-quoted assertion that he would lay down his life for two brothers or eight cousins, the genetic payoff of such altruistic self-sacrifice being the equivalence – as measured by ”bean-bag” genetics – of the numbers of gene copies between these sets of relatives.

In general, I am in broad agreement with the sentiment, although as we shall see, it requires modification.  Even more broadly, those on the Far Right invoke this paradigm to support the idea of altruistic self-sacrifice in favor of larger numbers of an ethny, in defense if ethnic genetic interests.  Likewise, I support that as well, with the proper modifications as with the smaller-scale examples of familial relatives.

Even though at first glance, Haldane’s reasoning seems sound, likely most people would be hesitant to follow that advice.  In large part, this is the natural impulse of self-preservation, but there are other reasonable objections that can be made.

One could argue, all else being equal, that judging between two sets of equivalent genetics, it’s better to preserve yourself for reasons of control.  A person concerned enough with genetic continuity that they would consider such altruistic self-sacrifice is someone likely to start a family, care for children, and properly actualize the continuity. Can you be sure your two brothers would do the same?  Why are they in the position that they need your sacrifice to begin with?  Are they stupid?  Reckless? Are you sure they’ll act in support of your (in this case indirect) genetic continuity with the same vigor you would do for yourself?  So, to be safe, maybe you need to raise the bar for self-sacrifice to three brothers or ten cousins?

A more important reason, and one that may be intuitively sensed by most people even though they wouldn’t be able to explain it, or likely even articulate their feeling about it, is that there is more about kinship than mere numbers of gene copies.  Genetic structure is important – what genes are coinherited and, to the layman’s eye, what phenotypic traits (derived from those genes) are inherited together.  Of course, family is going to be more similar here than (co-ethnic) strangers, but similarity is not identity.  Even with siblings (apart from identical twins, which are a special case), recombination and independent assortment will ensure that your brothers will have a distinct genetic stricture from you.  Now, granted, these same processed, even with a co-ethnic mate, will ensure that your children will also have a different genetic structure than you, but, all else being equal, your brothers’ children will be more unlike you, with respect to genetic structure, than your own children, as the “starting point” (you vs. your brothers) is already different. So, when genetic structure is taken into account, two brothers are not really your genetic equivalent.  Apart from an identical twin, you have no genetic equivalent, just degrees of relative similarity and difference, even after numbers of gene copies are accounted for.  Then how many brothers are sufficient for self-sacrifice?  This requires a more rigorous analysis, which will be dependent upon accurate measures of genetic structure, and that’s not something we can expect SJW population geneticists are likely to do. However, while the overall Haldane argument – and its Salterian extension – makes sense the numbers given based on “bean bag” genetics is going to be an underestimation of where you need to draw the line in sacrificing yourself for others.  On the other hand, the reverse is true – if you have to choose between your brothers and strangers, or between co-ethnics and non-ethnics, taking genetic structure into account means that helping your brothers and your co-ethnics is even more important than before, because in comparison to more genetically alien peoples, genetic structure amplifies how much more close you are to your brothers and your co-ethnics.  It’s a double-edged sword: it makes your own preservation a bit more important, but it also makes the preservation of those more similar to you more important than those more distant.

Now, one can argue that after several generations of recombination and independent assortment – even assuming endogamous mating within the ethny – genetic structures derived from your posterity and those of your brothers will be more or less the same, converging on the common pool of ethny-specific genetic structures.  So, while in the first generation, your offspring and that of your brothers may be distinct with respect to genetic structure, that difference would be attenuated over time and, as long as endogamous mating is maintained, your posterity and theirs would reflect similar genetic structures.  But there are problems here.  First, a rigorous analysis is required; perhaps some differences would continue over at least several generations; even if these differences are small, they nevertheless would need to be accounted for.  Second, if it is true that familial genetic strictures would tend, over time, to converge on more generalized ethny-specific structures, then why bother favoring two brothers over two random co-ethnics?  The brothers would share more of your genes, yes, and be more similar as far as genetic structure, but if one invokes “long term intergenerational effects” with respect to questioning the need to account for structure in modifying Haldane’s argument, then one can use the same “intergenerational effect” to directly question Haldane’s original premise.  The answer I believe is that one must do the best they can at a given time in maximizing their genetic payoff, and hope that subsequent generations do the same. In the absence of the required analysis, one can simply argue that looking to the next generation, differences in genetic structure are important and, hence, two brothers are not quite the genetic equivalence of yourself.  Your structure is different from theirs and the genetic payoff of your reproduction is greater for your than both of theirs combined.  So, maybe you need to hold out and sacrifice for three (or more) brothers instead, including for the other reason outlined above. Note that these fine points deal with very close genetic similarity.  When we are talking about racially alien peoples, the genetic distance becomes even more amplified with genetic structure, and in the absence of panmixia, ethny-specific patterns of genetic structure are broadly stable over evolutionary time (we can see that the Iceman is genetically more similar to Europeans than to, say, Asians  of Africans, as one example).

In the absence of the sort of careful quantitative analysis that population geneticists won't do, from a qualitative standpoint, it would be prudent to require more of a genetic payoff before engaging in Haldane-style altruistic self-sacrifice.  On the other hand, when considering a choice in investing between two genetic entities, picking the group genetically closer to you is even more important when considering genetic structure.  So, when the choice is between self vs. family or family vs. ethny, genetic structure will require a larger genetic payoff before agreeing to sacrifice the interests of the former for the latter. However, when considering a relative choice between ethny one vs. ethny two, genetic structure means that choosing the more similar-to-you ethny is even more important than with "bean-bag" genetics.  

The overall Salterian imperative remains the same as before, once these adjustments are made.