Sunday, December 17, 2017

Pathological Universal Altruism in Der Movement

Shining a light on “movement” pathology.

Readers of this blog know that I am skeptical of TOOs “high trust hunter gatherer” (HTHG) theory, which postulates that those Europeans heavily derived from Paleolithic Hunter Gatherer (PHG) ancestry are uniquely beset with the sort of individualism, moral universalism, pathological outgroup altruism, and tendencies for ingroup altruistic punishment that leaves them vulnerable to demographic displacement, acceptance of “refugee” invasions, and all the rest. And that contrasts to those European ethnies more heavily derived from Neolithic Farmer (NF) stock, allegedly more immune to those problems, and hence more ethnocentric, collectivist, and resistant to the “refugees.”  I pointed out the studies (even those whose data charts were on TOO itself years ago!) that clearly show no correlation between PHG vs. NF ancestry and the continuum of individualism vs. collectivism, that NF-derived nations are also being invaded by “refugees” and sending out ships to “rescue” the invaders, and that the relatively greater demographic displacement in the more PHG parts of Europe is, for the most part, due to those nations being wealthier, more orderly, with more generous social welfare benefits, and, hence, more attractive destinations for invaders and parasites; thus, they had a “head start” on the invasion now afflicting NF areas.

However, although this HTHG paradigm may not hold very well on the societal level, it may hold, ironically enough, among certain “movement leaders” who themselves are heavily of PHG stock, and who behave, within the confines of “movement” activism, with all of the outgroup altruism and ingroup altruistic punishment one would expect from universalists with their moral posturing and virtue signaling.

Thus, if we look at “movement leaders” themselves predominantly derived from “high trust hunter gatherers” we observe analogies to universalist moralist, extreme xenophile behavior.  They embrace enemies and shun friends; thus Jews and Asians are HBD gods, or obvious anti-racist infiltrators are quickly given “the keys to the kingdom” (“extreme vetting” being actually extremely porous, in the same way TOO claims that PHG types open their national borders to the alien - thus, outgroup altruism), miscegenating mudsharks are defended, “big tent” strategies are proposed, while on the other hand, long-time racial activists are blacklisted (thus, ingroup altruistic punishment), other “movement” leaders are feuded with, and White ethnics are attacked by the same types who swoon over Jews and Asians.  The similarities to the broader HTHG theory are striking. It’s the same basic attitude: love the alien, love the other, love your enemy, and welcome the stranger into your ranks, while hysterically acting out against people who are on your own side, often on delusional or hypocritical pretexts.  Does this behavior have a psychometric ethnic component?  Is it PHG-derived behavior?  Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t, but it is a hypothesis worth considering.

This phenomenon may be in part behind some of the tensions in the “movement” and this is also in part underlying some of the tensions between Type I and Type II activists; the former being particularly enriched in HTHG PHG types, and the latter being a mix between PHG and NF types. I’ve been noticing this in my own interactions in 20+ years of “movement” activism – these HTHG types cannot be trusted, they have zero loyalty, they engage in hypocritical SJW hysteria, they embrace the memetic (and sometimes ethnoracial) outgroup with open arms, and are always ready to disdain segments of their broader ingroup. 

In summary: “movement leaders” derived from PHG ancestry may be more prone to HTHG-type behavior within Der Movement itself, and are therefore vulnerable to exploitation by infiltrators and cunning yeastbuckets as well as to manipulation by Jews and Asians. In addition, to make matters worse, they are hostile to sincere activists, driving such people away.  

Is it any mystery that we’ve had so many decades of unremitting failure?

Saturday, December 16, 2017

A Low-Life Piece of Filth

A hypocritical ingrate.


There may well be some truth in his description of Romania and Romanians.  Who knows?  But, that’s not the point.  The point is that this scum, who is not ethnically Romanian, not only lives in Romania but has taken a Romanian woman to satisfy his sexual needs, and then has written a lengthy article warning us all how different, alien, low-IQ, and Gypsyized Romanians are.  Very good.  Then maybe you shouldn’t be living there?  Maybe you should have married a woman of your own ethnicity?

These people, the Romanians, with all their faults, let you live in their country, let you take one of their women (who could have instead married a Romanian and produced Romanian children), and you have nothing better to do than hysterically pontificate about how terrible the nation and its people are.  This reminds me of that other condescending scum writing for Counter-Currents about how terrible it was for him to endure Bulgarians in Bulgaria (their own country!), or Nicholas Farrell, living in Italy with an Italian wife, loudly sighing about all the stress he has there.  Well, how about, you know, getting the hell out, then?

This is the new ethnonationalism, you see, quota queens living in other people’s nations, sampling their women, and then sniffing disdainfully about how beneath them it all is.  One could imagine a very satisfying scenario in which some native skinhead types find these holier-than-thou ingrates and have an in-depth “discussion” with them about it all.  The ingrates could then write their next opinion piece from a hospital bed.

And we all look forward to the forthcoming Amren article telling us how alien, different, and non-Western Jews are.  I mean, such an article is coming, isn’t it?

Friday, December 15, 2017

Introducing SLC News

SLC = Stupidity, lies, and cowardice, with a “hat tip” to Saint Adolf.

Keeping track of “movement” dishonesty (“movement dishonesty” – a redundant term).

General “movement” dishonesty and misinterpretations of Madison Grant and population genetics.


A problem distinguishing the four cardinal directions.


Hitler took German identity and the existence of a north-south cline within Europe as essentially justifying the subjugation of Eastern European humanity as a whole as expendable inferiors, rather than as potential allies.

You know, North-South is not the same as East-West.  Essentially, Hitler – much kike modern-day Nutzis, despised any group that was not “Germanic” – whether these be from the South of East of Europe.

Speaking of Nutzis, a comment from that article:


Hitler (and Western people in general) correctly considered Russians to be Asiatic barbarians, To this day Russia is ruled by oriental despots;

Why would anyone want to ally with an aggressive and corrupt regime?

Heil Merkel!  The Ultra Aryan!  Heil!  Heil! Heil!

Tin Cup Tuesday!  Happy Holidays, suckers!


The “solution” is to walk around wearing shorts, spouting Norse poetry, blowing on Viking horns (reality or euphemism, who knows?), and letting leftist infiltrators “vet” your meetings.  Even the “Far-Right” in the UK is a joke.



Attorney Glen Allen was fired by the city of Baltimore because of information found in records more than a decade old that were probably stolen from the now all-but-defunct National Alliance. Mr. Allen supposedly attended a conference or bought reading material. Therefore, he was fired as a lawyer simply for associating with a group liberals do not like, not because of any professional misconduct over a career of many years.

Is that the material taken by “Smoky Mountain SS?”  Or another instance of files walking away from the great vanguard of the Aryan renaissance?  The tragicomedy gets better and better.


The tin cup panhandlers at VDARE have it right: Trump – “the last chance for White America” – has turned out to be a cucking, elitist, mainstream Establishment Republican disaster.

While the Beavis-and-Butthead gamesters squeal with delight with every Trumpian Twitter “neg’ the adults in the room realize that Trump is squandering all is political capital and is busy dismantling the base that elected him. Who was it again who labeled Trump – from the very beginning – a “vulgar ignorant buffoon?”

More typical Type I “movement” commentary:

Your comment was good until the last five lines. We here on the European continent are under the onslaught of uncontrolled immigration invasion from Eastern Europe.

The hatred e.g. of Poles or Russians toward Germans and Westerners has the same nature of Blacks’ against White Americans: Poles and Blacks have contributed nothing to modern civilisation so they want to destroy it, out of envy and hatred against its creators.
Slavs who didn’t mix with Asians are White, but they are a small minority.

That’s from a comment left at The Occidental Observer.


That’s a story where all sides are stupid. First, the Alt Right and other precincts of Der Movement elevate ditzy female airheads as “movement” celebrities in a form of sex-based affirmative action to go along with the usual ethnic quotas.  Then these females are over-sensitive as well as vacuous.  Finally, the Beavis-and-Butthead brigade behave like typical juvenile jackasses.  Instead of “trolling” these trollops, just ignore them – you are the ones who created them in the first place by paying attention to them simply because they (presumably) have two X chromosomes, breasts, and a vagina.  You real what you sow.

Yeah, Derb, dumb Whites need to discriminate against smart Asians, or else we’ll have all sorts of resentment against them for taking over the top spots in society.

One question though.  If Asians are so much superior, why do they have to emigrate to White countries?  Why is, for example, the USA so much better that Asians come here?  Why, even a low-IQ greasy swarthoid train wreck like Italy has Chinatown infestations. Why do Chinese emigrate to Italy?  

One would have to think that maybe the Asians are not so superior after all, or they’re just invading, either relieve their population pressure or just for imperialistic urges.

In any case, we must resist them.  ALL of them.  Right, Derb?

A complete inversion of reality:

Greg Johnson
Posted December 14, 2017 at 3:35 pm | Permalink
There’s no affirmative action for women in this movement.
Your anger is misplaced.


Of course there is female affirmative action, in addition to the traditional ethnic-based version.  All these giggling, ditzy female airheads are being elevated solely because of their sex.  

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Sir MGTOW and the Yeastbuckets

Some sense.

With all the recent hysteria about “women in the movement,” all of the voluminous scribblings and yawn-inducing podcasts, I note that most miss the point that this latest explosion is no doubt at least in part a male reaction to the ongoing “sexual harassment” moral panic burning through the mainstream society.  Indeed, there is the daily auto da fe, in which some screeching yeastbucket, full of moral righteousness and supported by myriads of conformist robots, accuses some hapless man of looking at her the wrong way twenty years ago. To the stake!  Nobody escapes the Spanish Inquisition!

Now, having to put up with these hectoring harridans in the “normie” realm, activist men do not want to have to endure smug, smirking women, and their White Knight enablers, behaving as if they are the SJW HR Department of Der Movement, laying down the law to all of us knuckle-dragging male brutes on how we are to behave to Milady Mudshark, Ganges Girl, Flabby Philosocat, or any of the others.

The reason for the Type I Alt Right “bullying” (and, yes, I’m no fan of their Beavis-and-Butthead activities either) and the Type II Sallisian (intentionally comic, for the autistically obtuse among you) tirades is, frankly, we’ve had enough of female-to male moral posturing.  Why is that so difficult to understand?


No immunity from criticism.  Get it, Counter-Currents?  Accountability for all, including your delicate little ladies.  

I’m sure you disagree. Always got to side with “da wimmin” though, right?  

A cruder but nevertheless accurate observation on the same topic   (emphasis added):

Weimar Republican

Ah yes the old Philosofat, I mean cat, lecturing men about masculinity, along with the rest of these empty-headed e-sluts. If you idiots are too clueless to see that all these ‘based’ childless cat ladies represent nothing but a feminist coup, then this movement and the white race deserve to die. This tubby bitch gets less than 2k viewers a video and has the audacity to tell critics of feminism to leave the Alt-Right.
Dear White Knights, have some self-respect because nobody else respects you, including these mediocre 4s you are pretending are Aryan maidens in a meadow.
I’m gonna shout from the hills until I’m banned: women are the death of any movement. Look at what they are doing to leftism as we speak. They will spread their #MeToo coup here next. Stop being a bunch of spineless, thirsty beta-orbiters and open your fucking eyes before it’s too late.
Roy Moore was accused by Republican women voters. Women are not political. They side with whoever is the strongest at any given moment. Be strong and they will come on their own. Stop pandering to pussy.

“Mediocre 4s?”  No, no, a thousand times, no!  These are great beauties (the faces that launched a thousand charging White Knights), and obviously – quite obviously, let there be no doubt! – that any criticism of these charming maidens is only – solely! – because all we insecure men are secretly enraged that they refused to go to the high school prom with us.  

Johnson debates “Longshanks” – which a (very interesting) website asserts is a South Asian.  I do not know for sure whether or not the individual identified at that post is really the Aryan warrior “Sven” but if it is, it’s another in a long series of non-Whites pushing a narrative of ultra-purity for Whites, and one can only guess (don’t try too hard, it’s not that difficult) about the underlying motive. There’s not only this (alleged) fellow, but others as well: deranged mestizos (“Sallis’ sophistry”), snarky Iranians (for Aryans!  For Aryans!)…the list goes on.  And since these specimens know how to appeal to Type I Nutzis, there’s always a place for them at the table (no place for Sallis, of course).  Type I Nutzis are really a problem.  We Type II activists are the solution.

And then some female idiot at Counter-Currents, some inane commentator, says that MGTOW is worse than feminism.  Are you mad?  Feminism is one of the major weapons used by the System to destroy the White race and wreck Western civilization; MGTOW is simply a reaction to that.  Now, taken to extremes, MGTOW can be racially destructive (we need to reproduce, after all), but taken to moderation, it can be useful. Instead of White Knighting, and the sweaty pussy pedestalization of “game,” it can serve men well to be more aloof from women, shift the supply-demand curve more to the benefit of men, instead of being one-sided to the advantage of women.  If it comes down to Sir MGTOW vs. the Yeastbuckets, I side with the former against the latter.

And a side note: All these Alt Right guys getting all excited over “Hatreon” – don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched.  Was it necessary to parody Patreon so obviously? Another example of Type I “movement” childishness.




Wednesday, December 13, 2017

More on Der Movement's White-Knighting

Part of the moral panic.

Another breathless White-knighting Counter-Currents article says:

This leads us to the current issue with the online abuse of Alt Right women. Yes, the victims are all women, but what’s more, they are attractive women, especially McCarthy and Southern. This, I believe, is the main reason why their male followers place unreasonable demands upon them, demands that they would not place on their male counterparts. This also explains why the emotional responses to their foibles or past indiscretions have been so heated and cruel. Through no fault of their own, these women have the tendency to make young, insecure men feel mean.

Maybe the mudshark Southern is attractive.  But McCarthy?  Are you serious?  These are omega male standards.  And guess what, not everyone criticizing them is “young” or “insecure.”  The current crop of Counter-Currents writers are at a low level of quality.  It’s truly embarrassing.

A good comment:

This wasnt attack on women in alt-right. This was attack against coalburning camwhore Southern who is not alt-right and only exploiting right wing men and Tara who came in her defense for no reason whatsoever and used feminist talking points to defend her.
I am sad to see counter-currents decided to publish this feminist article and I am deeply troubled by the collectivist response by women in alt-right. They closed ranks as if they personally were attacked. This kind of attack is something that would never work with men. I was never against women in alt-right, there is small minority of women who are capable, but this response has had me thinking.

Johnson’s telling Freudian slip (emphasis added to the original 12/13/17 version [in case it’s changed]):

When someone is attacking you with a knife, you are a fool to wonder if maybe he has a point to make. He’s trying to harm you. You need to stop him, not debate him. Once I glimpse malice and dishonesty in a person, I shit from debating to shutting him down.

Yeah, Greg, that’s exactly what you’re doing to the debate.

What I see as a problem in Counter-Currents' latest hysteria in defense of ditzy females is that it is taking place in the context of the current "sexual harassment moral panic" that is burning down American society.  It seems to me there's a connection here, the same type of "women are always right, XX chromosomes uber alles" mentality.  It may be true that the "trolling" was "over-the-top" but there have been reasonable comments on Counter-Currents from a pro-male position (see above), and we see the response: "shit from debating."  Indeed.

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Female Followup, 12/12/17

More precise points to be made.

Since this is an important topic, I'd like to follow up on my last post and get more into the "female question" with somewhat more seriousness and reflection.

Certainly, women have a place within racial nationalism.  It's their race too.  But some points to ponder:

1. We can debate whether or not to accept reformed mudsharks (*) but certainly CURRENT mudsharks should be anathema.  Why should we even have to debate something so basic?

2. Women need to be held to the same standards as men with respect to handling the "rough and tumble" world of dissident politics.  We've all been insulted.  I certainly have been over the years (often in vulgar terms - remember Silver?), including being insulted by Johnson himself (questioning my sanity).  Certainly, there have been ethnic-based insults.  Whatever.  Johnson has been viciously attacked himself over his personal life.  Anyone of any prominence in the "movement" - even a lower-level person like myself - has been subjected to harsh criticism.  Deal with it ladies, or move on.  Don't expect to be pampered - in the "movement" zoo, it's not going to happen, the chimps are going to be flinging their turds around on a regular basis.

3. If I'm going to eschew male Alt Lighters and other nitwits, I'll do the same for females as well.

Look, it's a question of character; the basic problem with Der Movement, Inc. - besides the fossilized dogma - is a question of character.  There's too much emphasis on quantity over quality, too much eagerness to accept anyone, any validation, any sign of acceptance, no matter how flawed and tainted.  I don't care if a race-mixing female posing as some sort of nationalist has "hundreds of thousands of followers."  If the person in question is of flawed character, then that's just multiplication of the flaw.  That's adding zeroes to an already corrupted number.

If that's "misogyny" then so be it.

*The white-knighting riposte here would be: "what about Spencer, Anglin, and Enoch" (or some other male activist with a history of dating/marrying, say, Asians or Jews)?  Three points.  First, those are your heroes, not mine.  As far as I'm concerned the entire "movement" should be flushed down the toilet.  Second, why leave out Derbyshire?  He considers himself Alt Right, and as part of the VDARE crew, is dipping into "movement" largess.  Why does Derbyshire always get a free pass?  Third, like it or not, female miscegenation is more damaging since women are the bottlenecks for reproduction.  But, yes, I don't excuse males who mix, but, fine, we can have an amnesty for the past.  This still doesn't excise CURRENT miscegenation.

Behold the Female, 12/12/17

Who are the real bastards (and bitches)?

Over at Counter-Currents, Greg Johnson goes railing against all the “bastards” in the “movement” (including me I suppose); the latest firestorm set off in defense of a pair of ditzy female airheads that any man of sense, any rational and serious activist, wouldn’t spend one nanosecond of their time thinking about (and that goes for all the Type I Nutzis attacking the vagina-holes to begin with) (*).

Putting the XX chromosome flotsam and jetsam (redundancy?) aside, what about Johnson’s main arguments in his tirade?  I mean, yes, I agree with the general sentiment.  But Counter-Currents is part of the problem, not part of the solution.  What with the endless feuding with Richard Spencer, and then the thin-skinned hysterical reaction against your humble blogger here for insisting on “movement” accountability, isn’t it possible that some people view Counter-Currents in the same manner that Counter-Currents views all the other “bastards” out there?  Remember the biblical passage about motes and beams, and all that.

I think a lot of these attacks are simply motivated by financial jealousy. 

Oh, yes, indeed, I agree: many of the “movement” feuds and infighting are motivated by financial jealousy.  I can certainly think of famous “movement” feuds of like character, some fairly recent.  But that’s only among the panhandlers, the tin cuppers.  Some of us are not asking for any money.  


Lauren can spend her earnings on any frilly, silly, frivolous thing she wants. It is a mistake to allow donors to think that they own a piece of you and can attach strings to their gifts. I have fired donors who have tried to do that.

It is hard for me to express my level of utter disgust with this quote.  The arrogance is breathtaking.  Gimme dat money – but don’t tell me how to spend it!   God forbid that donors “attach strings” to their money like, you know, having it spent on activities related to – gasp! – actual racial nationalism. No, damgummint, if Lauren wants to spend donations on “frilly things” (the mind boggles) she has that right!  Other folks want to spend donor money on opera tickets or dog food, hey, who are you to say nay to that?  

Really, now, this is just too much.  “Fired donors?”  Some people in the “movement” have balls the size of Jupiter and Saturn, that’s for sure; I haven’t seen such purified chutzpah since the last gelfite fish convention.

And you suckers still give money to these people who are basically metaphorically giving you the middle finger with one hand while they grab your cash with the other.  You should only hope you get “donor fired.”  Then you can spend your own money on your own (hopefully non-frivolous) things.  After all, it’s your money.  You earned it.  Spend it wisely.

And yet another XX heroine writes:

First of all, it seems really suspicious that the He-Man Woman-haters Club has suddenly come out in full force, often hiding behind fake names and new accounts. These are not people who stick their necks out for our cause. They are spending huge amounts of time online trying to drive women away from our movement. Are these men really nationalists? I don’t think so. Many of them are probably infiltrators.

I hate being vulgar and Alt Right-like, but in this one special case, I’ll make an exception, channel my inner Beavis-and-Butthead, and reply thus: go fuck yourself, you dumb cunt.  I’ve been involved in racial nationalism when many of these “ladies of the movement” were infants or toddlers; I was involved in “meatspace” IRL analog activism back when these budding Joan-of-Arcs were wearing diapers, I sacrificed career advancement because of all the time and effort spent in producing “movement” content (including material for Counter-Currents, by the way), I went to meet the Great Sage on the Mountaintop when these female soldiers of glory were sucking their thumbs (back then, only their thumbs) pining away for Santa Claus (and not for their latest Colored boyfriend), but, hey, if I dare criticize any of these sacrosanct ladies then I’m an infiltrator.  Well, yes, I know that Counter-Currents has vast experience with infiltrators, but maybe, just maybe, all you heroes are wrong this time?

No, let’s go off “white knighting” for active mudsharks, giggling retards, pontificating “Chinese maidens,” smug “beauties” with a room temperature IQ, and whiners who assert that any criticism is from“infiltrators.”

Pathetic.

And for those of you who think my own (somewhat tongue-in-cheek) tirade is "excessive" I'll simply point out that if Counter-Currents didn't ban me from commenting, I could have made more mature and restrained ripostes at the actual blog post in question.  Being unable to do so, it would seem that the comic tirade here is a good way of attracting attention to my views on the matter. Granted, women can have a place in the "movement."  The types of people Johnson defends we could do without, however.  There's a big difference.  And the panhandling arrogance just grates on me. 

*Aren't I wasting time thinking about them?  Only to answer Johnson's post. I hardly know who any of these women are other than perhaps engaging with their content briefly out of curiosity before turning if off after I couldn't take any more of the superficially silly stupidity.