EGI Notes

Sunday, September 24, 2017

It’s Time to Defund the “Movement”

Problems and a solution.

There are those who perhaps do not understand why a blog called EGI Notes comments on the state of the “movement.”  I would have thought it obvious, but there are of course cognitively deficient individuals in racial activism, as there are in the general society.  More to the point, likely many of these people merely pretend not to understand in order to oppose such criticism, and in some cases the opposition to my criticism has its basis in rent-seeking behavior.  After all, if one lives off of supporter donations, one wouldn’t want those supporters to get any idea that the money is being wasted, would they? Is that one reason Pierce had an online unit dedicated to discrediting Covington?  And is that why some today become so hysterical when I and others point out objective facts about “movement” ineptitude?

For those who, for reasons of deficiency or mendacity, do not see the point of linking genetic interests with criticism of the “movement,” the following may be helpful:

1. The only credible approach for pursuing ethnic genetic interests (with “ethnic” here meaning “ethny” in its broadest sense) is through racial nationalism (at the racial level) and ethnic nationalism (at the ethnic level).

2. For a long time, such nationalism has been encompassed within a sociopolitical artifact that I call “the movement” (or “Der Movement”).

3. Therefore, it is quite clear that the state of such a “movement” has a powerful, direct influence on our ability to pursue our genetic interests.

4. Hence, any blog dedicated to “EGI” will as a matter of course have analysis of this “movement” as a major area of concern.

QED.

Having put that aside, let’s consider some recent events. Emphasis added:

The Head of Research suggested infiltrating London Forum, a convention that attracts right-wing extremists of varying piousness, from the ethnosocialists in British National Party to downright Holocaust deniers. Hermansson quickly connected with the founder of the forum, Stead Steadman, who as many others in the subculture nurtures a fetish for Sweden.
”He learned Swedish and Icelandic by studying the Edda. He worships Thor and Odin.”

One could write volumes about that, but two quick points will suffice. First, when reality converges on caricature, you know you have a real problem. Second, any reader of my work over the years could have predicted this embarrassing nonsense with 100% accuracy.  
His guide, Stead Steadman, the man behind London Forum, opened his big, black phone book with numbers and e-mail addresses to all of the Nazi leaders in the West. Many happily participated in interviews for the “thesis.” 

No doubt they “happily participated.”  

Hermansson met dark horse Greg Johnson who founded a Nazi-convention in Seattle. ”He offered me to speak at the opening about my thesis topic: how the left has infiltrated the right. I spoke in front of 75 armed white supremacists.”

Now, the heavy breathing about “75 armed white supremacists” is just moronic leftist hysteria, which can be more accurately written: “75 white nationalists who were either unarmed or, if in any way lightly armed, was merely for protection against leftist attacks.” 

That one phrase aside, is any of the above in any way inaccurate? Essentially, reading between the lines of accounts written by “movement” figures themselves, it would seem the above storyline tracks well.  We have a young Swedish homosexual, posing as a “newcomer” to the “movement,” with a transparently flimsy cover story that no one involved in the vetting bothered to seriously and comprehensively check out, being given year-long access to private “movement” meetings, getting to interview prominent “movement” figures, while – as these figures tell us in their own explanations – sincere, legitimate activists were blocked out of various events because of the vetting.  Obviously then, it stands to reason that the infiltrator was given special treatment. Hermansson states that his preferential treatment was because of his Nordic Swedish ancestry and the “movement’s” obsession with that background, as well as Steadman’s own particular interest in, and practice of, “Germanic paganism.”  Indeed, it seems that Hermansson was chosen to play the infiltrator role precisely because the leftist extremists knew that he would be attractive (in one way or another) to “movement” activists. This much is clear, and “movement” figures really do not deny any of this, they just attack those who point it out.  

Now, no doubt, the “movement” spin doctors will tell us that the Hermansson incident may well not have much of a long-term impact.  It’ll be in the news for a while, fade away, everyone will forget about it, and then it’s back to business as usual.  

Maybe so. But that’s not the point of course.  It’s not the incident itself that is the major problem, but what it tells us about the incredibly bad judgment and raw incompetence of “movement leadership” and how it tragicomically lifts the lid on underlying “movement” obsessions and fetishes. You see, it is precisely “business as usual” that is the problem here, and in the long run, the best thing for a real movement is if this incident does not go away, and we do not have business as usual (sadly, given people’s short attention spans, likely it will all be forgotten in a week or two).

Business as usual will one day lead to a situation in which there is an extremely serious “movement” private meeting, where crucially important high strategy is being discussed, and fundamentally important planning is being conducted, and sitting at that meeting, secretly recording everything, will be some anti-racist infiltrator, let in and given the keys to the kingdom because of some stupid reason (e.g., “he’s Swedish”)..

And now we move on to recent events involving AltRight.com.

Surprise!  EGI Notes right once again: Spencer on Jorjani.  The two in happier days.

OK, all true I guess, but a little late, no?  I can’t help think back when I was criticizing the involvement of Jorjani in the Alt Right, and when the “white trash” (Jorjani’s words) of the AltRight.com commentariat were rightfully skeptical, the Alt Right crew were all on board the Jorjani train. To be fair to AltRight.com, they weren’t the only Alt Righters taken in by Jorjani. Those other individuals know who they are – as do I.  It was obvious from the beginning that Jorjani was everything the Alt Right is realizing now.  Even Silver had the good sense to question the Alt Right's judgment on this, many months ago. So, from my third party observation deck, I shake my head sadly, and have my understanding of the poor judgment of “movement leadership” confirmed once again.

What’s the solution?

Out in the real world, when people fail miserably, when they make horrendous mistakes, when they make their businesses or institutions “crash and burn,” they typically resign or are fired. “Movement” leaders, being without shame, will not resign, so they must be fired. How are they to be fired? Look at it from the economic angle, supply and demand, costs and benefits, payment and service.  Are supporters getting their money’s worth from their donations?  If not, then why give?  Defund the “movement” as it currently exists, and stop supporting failed leadership.

Cut them off financially.  Don’t give them a penny. No donations.  No book purchases. No nothing.  Do not support them as professional activists any longer.  After all, most of these individuals complain all the time about the sacrifices they make, so we can assume they would certainly prefer the experience of actually having to earn a living through regular work. These individuals could, if they so wished, still be part-time unpaid activists, but they would no longer be financially supported allowing them to fulfill the leadership roles they have so clearly failed in.

Long time readers of this blog may point out that I have previously written about the need to support full time activists and that a step toward victory would be when such activists could live a comfortable, middle-class lifestyle. I stand by that and there is no inconsistency, because it is expected that in exchange for that support, the leadership will be effective and accountable, and neither of those two characteristics define current leadership. Letting Hermansson joyride through the “movement” for a year, or enabling Jorjani’s rambling, are certainly not examples of effectiveness, and no one is being held accountable for any of it.  And those are just two examples from an endless litany of “movement” woe. Further, much of the largesse being bestowed on the “movement” isn’t even going to racial nationalists.  For example:

The Connecticut-based VDare Foundation is led by Peter Brimelow, founder and editor of an anti-immigration website. Brimelow, who spoke at the National Policy Institute’s conference last month, founded his nonprofit in 1999 and raised nearly $4.8 million between 2007 and 2015.
Brimelow has denied that his website is white nationalist but acknowledged it publishes works by writers who fit that description “in the sense that they aim to defend the interests of American whites.”
Brimelow received $378,418 in compensation from his nonprofit in 2007, accounting for nearly three-quarters of its total expenses that year. Brimelow says his salary that year was $170,000 and the rest reimbursed him for travel, office supplies and other expenses.
From 2010 through 2015, VDare Foundation didn’t report any compensation directly paid to Brimelow. But, starting in 2010, the nonprofit began making annual payments of up to $368,500 to Brimelow’s Happy Penguins LLC for “leased employees.” Brimelow disclosed his ownership of that company on tax returns.

All that money for VDARE, it’s milquetoast articles, Sailer writing about real estate and golf courses, “cheesecake” photos of women accompanying stories, and last but not least Derbyshire. Brimelow: a $170,000 salary (year 2007) for being the editor of that website; that is is pretty good “work” if you can find it.  And can we be told who are the "leased employees" who are being paid out of the “up to $368,500” (2010-present)? That is actually indicative of another issue: financial accountability.  Why don’t all these activists living off donations tell supporters how the money is spent?  How much goes for salary? How much for operating expenses, and what are those expenses?  If we are talking about hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars shouldn’t those who donate know how it is being spent?

Not to put too fine of  a point on it, but some "activists" seem to live a lot better than most of the supporters they implore donations from: trendy blue state lifestyles, frequent international travel, vacations, pets (how much donation money goes for dog food, for example?), etc.

That’s step one, at least: get financial accountability.  Step two is actual accountability of performance, and since “movement leadership” has so clearly failed in that respect, they should be feel it in the pocketbook.

What about those activists who come from wealthy families, and who do not require handouts?  Won't my suggestions give them an unfair advantage in the “Darwinian competition” between activists?  Perhaps, but life isn’t fair, and we must do the best we can. If such individuals exist, and if they fail as leaders, they can be dealt with by withdrawing other forms of input and support.  A stereotype (and don’t we believe that all stereotypes have a basis in truth?) of inherited wealth is that such individuals have a sense of entitlement, a habit of immediate gratification, a low threshold for frustration, and a lack of long term resiliency.  If they observe that their followers are getting frustrated with leadership failure, if they see they are being constantly criticized or increasingly ignored, then they may take their private money and find a new toy to play with; they may give up on activism even if they would still have the financial means to continue.  So, in all cases, shutting off the money spigot isn’t enough; if you have had enough with failure, then take your business – ideological and social as well as financial – elsewhere.

Assuming we stop wasting donations, what should be done with the money instead?  A good short term solution is to fund specific projects instead of just showering individuals with money; at least one website to do so has been established, and that is a good start, assuming that the projects have clearly defined goals and the recipients of the donations are held accountable (that word again) to the donors for successfully completing the project. That would be equivalent to a grant award.  More long term solutions would include establishing competent think tanks and other organizations, professionally run, with – you guessed it – performance and financial accountability, and these groups, openly racial nationalist, can support competent full time racial activists at the lifestyle level alluded to above.  

But the way things are going now, any of my readers who are donating to the “movement” are essentially performing the equivalent of flushing money down the toilet. You are feeding a metastatic cancer. We need chemotherapy here.  Analogous to an “angiogenesis inhibitor” cutting off a tumor’s blood supply, we need to cut off the money supply to the various “movement” cancer cells proliferating around us.

I’m not optimistic that I will be able to get most activists from pouring good money after bad. But I can certainly try.  Any progress, even incremental, in preventing the enabling of chronic failure, would be helpful  Even though many precincts of the “movement” are well-funded, a big enough financial hit may well slow them down enough to open the field for other people, better people, to establish themselves.  And once a New Movement gets established, then you will have a real choice as to who you can support.

The power – including the power of the pocketbook – is in your hands (and wallets).  And if you need a reminder as to why this is important, let's consider some of the things that have occurred in 2017 alone (forgetting for a moment the last 50-60 years of utter "movement" failure):

1. The Spencer-Friberg-Johnson feud
2. The Charlottesville fiasco and subsequent "deplatforming"
3. The humiliation of the Alt Right by Trump's constant betrayals
4. The Alt Lite turning against the Alt Right after the latter tried to bring the former into a "big tent" against all reason and common sense
5. A prominent "movement" activist promoting the idea that Europeans should "ethnically cleanse" each other after national disagreements
6. The Jorjani fiasco on the Alt Right
7. Last but not least the Hermansson infiltration came to our (and world) attention

Is that worth your continued support?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, September 22, 2017

A Response To Greg Johnson

Behold the "movement."

Greg Johnson writes at Counter-Currents:

Ted,
This will be your last comment here. You’ve got your own blog for your embittered rants. You no longer have anything constructive to contribute.
Greg Johnson

Greg, believe it or not, I always thought you were a good guy and a useful intellectual contributor (despite our disagreements).  Apparently though, you are a bit too thin-skinned, a trait that won’t serve you going forward.  An inability to accept criticism, however harsh, from your own side, is the path to personal stagnation. To answer your latest criticism (which I accept with no personal rancor):

I may well be a “crazy, bitter, low information moralizer,” but I’m also not the one responsible for the potential doxing of dozens of activists, I’m not the one who let an infiltrator waltz through “extreme vetting” because of ethnic fetishism and affirmative action, I’m not the one who took The Great Persiante Shah Jorjani seriously, I’m not the one who let “Smoky Mountain SS” walk off with secret National Alliance files to be handed off to “watchdog groups,” I’m not the one who invites Hart, Weissberg, and Derbyshire to speak at conferences, I’m not the one who lived on a mountaintop engaging in serial monogamy while living off the donations of members who I secretly (and not so secretly) despised, I’m not the one who cheerfully interviews activists who I publicly accused of being untrustworthy and mentally unstable only a few years prior, I’m not the one who changes fundamental aspects of my worldview essentially to spite other activists with whom I’m engaged in a public feud, I’m not the one who shamelessly panhandles for money online using pictures of my children (who are too young to understand how they are being used), I’m not the one who throws activists who I recently posed with “under the bus” because they did something that may offend some of my Jewish supporters,  I’m not the one who chuckles with Jewish correspondents about how a prominent racialist activist “may get shot,” I’m not the one who considers certain “movement” figures to be “rock stars” that are immune from criticism – while at the same time criticizing the “personality cults” of Jewish intellectual movements, I’m not the one who championed “mainstreaming” for years and stated that Marine Le Pen’s election was the last chance for a peaceful resolution of Europe’s racial crisis while having no comments to make about her humiliating electoral defeat, I’m not the one who publicly airs the most intimate of “dirty laundry” in “movement” feuds (although I do know plenty of such laundry, some of which I’ve kept to myself for two decades), I’m not the one who writes that it is good to sometimes “punch right” but who then myself exhibits a “glass jaw” when a few legitimate memetic punches are thrown in my direction, I’m not the one who publicly questions why possession of child porn should be illegal, I’m not the one who writes under two different names and then does podcasts under each name thinking that no one will notice that the voice is exactly the same (granted, most “movement” activists are so clueless and unaware that I’m sure they did not notice), I’m not the one who wrote that “Trump is the last hope for White America” and I’m not the one who makes the “man on white horse” error over and over and over again, I’m not the one who made a cartoon frog and “Kek” the symbols of racial activism, I’m not the one who gambled away supporter contributions, I'm not the one who organized Charlottesville or threw up my right arm at Hailgate, and I’m not the one responsible for decades of racial nationalist failure and incompetence.  That’s the purview, it seems, of sane, cheerful, high-information activists.  

That’s not an “embittered rant.” It is in fact objective truth, and if there is one single point listed in the above paragraph that is factually incorrect, then please point it out. But there are none. Not a single one. What we have here is simply personal anger and hurt feelings up against verifiable, objective facts. Is this perhaps a clue as to why incidents like a year-long infiltration by a thinly disguised informant repeatedly take place?

Good luck with your blog.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, September 21, 2017

A Question of Accountability

Another in an endless series of failures and humiliations.

I am sure that by now readers know about the latest unmitigated “movement” disaster, the all-too-predicable infiltration and “exposure” of the Alt Right by a heroic two-fisted Swede ("Oh, look at what a tough guy I am, I really wanted to punch those Nutzis in the face, but I didn’t want to damage my manicure on their coke-bottom spectacles”).



In May of this year, I went to London to speak at the London Forum and the first annual Jonathan Bowden dinner. Stead Steadman introduced me to a young Swedish man going by the name Erik Hellberg. I was told that Erik was, like so many others, a newcomer to the movement who was going to write a master’s thesis on doxing, deplatforming, and harassment directed at White Nationalists.

The day after the London Forum, Stead and I met with Erik in a quiet hotel bar for a brief interview. I talked about my own experiences of harassment in San Francisco. We also talked a bit about White Nationalism in general, as well as other people he might interview. I suggested he talk to Charles Krafft, who had much more interesting stories than mine.
Erik seemed a nice enough fellow. A bit socially awkward, a bit inarticulate, a bit effeminate, but not so outside the norm for academic types that I felt suspicious. And he came with the recommendation of Stead Steadman.
Later Erik told me he was going to the US. I told him that friends of mine were holding a Northwest Forum meeting Seattle in June, and it would be an opportunity to interview Charles. I figured that if he had passed vetting for the London Forum and the Bowden Dinner, he would be fine for the Northwest Forum as well. (Stead actually has a reputation for being too strict in his vetting procedures, which made it impossible for some of Millennial Woes’ fans to see him speak at the May Forum.) 

I initially commented on that at Counter-Currents thus:

First, I am sorry that Greg and others had this bad experience with the low-rent piece of dishonest trash Hermansson.

Second, I've been involved with the "movement" since the mid-90s, and I must say that this sort of thing happens with distressing regularity.  WNs too nice? Too trusting?  Yes, but also horrifically bad security.  There needs to be a careful evaluation of this case.  How did Hermansson pass the "extreme vetting?" What went wrong?  There also needs to be accountability.  Hermansson was recommended by "Stead Steadman" (whoever that is).  Very well.  Why?  What credentials did Hermansson have that impressed Steadman to his sincerity? Without accountability and without responsibility, nothing will ever change.
And can I suggest that "newcomers to the movement" not be invited to private events?  Unfair to those who are sincere?  Yes, but too bad.  Perhaps a higher level of personal interaction needs to be earned.

And how did this nice Swedish fellow get through Steadman’s “extreme vetting” and all the other “extreme vetting” that would likely have had a Codreanu or an Evola booted out with a swift kick in the rear?  Well, I had my suspicions, but kept it to myself until the other shoe dropped (emphasis added):

Mr. Hermansson, who was sent undercover by the British anti-racist watchdog group Hope Not Hate, spent months insinuating himself into the alt-right, using his Swedish nationality (many neo-Nazis are obsessed with Sweden because of its “Nordic” heritage) as a way in.

Hermansson also notes in the video how Steadman's interest with "Germanic paganism" (who would have ever guessed?) made Steadman and friends vulnerable to the attentions of a Scandinavian Nordic

Hoist on the petard of its own Nordicism, ethnic affirmative action, and ethnic fetishism – Der Movement marches on.  Can I say: I told you so?  Yes, indeed, as any reader of EGI Notes know well.  Please note how the enemy knows Der Movement well also: who they choose as an infiltrator, knowing that a Nordic Scandinavian will be given a free pass and handed the keys to the kingdom.  

We have a “movement” that ridiculed and killed a Joe Tommasi but that welcomes an infiltrating scumbag like Hermansson with open arms – and then any have the nerve to assert that there is no such thing as “affirmative action” in Der Movement?  Have you ever seen such a bunch of dishonest individuals with zero self-awareness?  The anti-racists know better, and use that knowledge against the “movement” and its obsessions, as we see in this case.

More from Johnson:

I also suggested that Erik speak briefly at the Northwest Forum about his research project, to see if others in attendance would be interested in an interview.

It turns out that Erik Hellberg is really named Patrik Hermansson, and he was a spy for the antifa group Hope Not Hate. Not only was he recording interviews with people, he was also wearing a hidden camera and taking videos, and the results of his year-long investigations are going to be released as a documentary video.
My initial reaction to this news was a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach. I imagine that everyone Erik spoke to felt the same way. He certainly made the rounds, attending the Extremists Club in London, the London Forum, the Northwest Forum, and even Unite the Right in Charlottesville, insinuating his way into the good graces of Jez Turner and Stead Steadman, and interviewing not only me but also Millennial Woes, Tom Sunic, Gregory Lauder-Frost, Jason Jorjani, and Daniel Friberg, as well as chatting up countless people at various events.
It is terrible to feel that one’s trust has been violated by a rat, and it is even worse to feel that you lent your credibility to such a person, so he could violate even more people’s trust. In particular, I must apologize to the 30-odd people at the Northwest Forum who were exposed to this snitch because of me…I also have to laugh at the pretense that Hermansson was risking his life. The only person who ever harmed him was a fellow Leftist in Charlottesville. Frankly, one of the chief lessons of this fiasco is that White Nationalists are far too nice. One always regrets being too kind…I wanted to see how long it would take before a photo got out, and I wanted to see who would finally put it out there: the enemy or one of the many loathsome people in our movement. I was betting it would be movement scum, and I was right. An old photo of me was dug up and circulated in January, and other pictures were surreptitiously taken at the last AmRen conference. So Hope Not Hate is a distant third.

In his post, Greg talks about Jorjani.  Let’s take a look in that direction to see what it tells us about the “movement.” Paradoxically (or perhaps not, if one views the fundamental basis of the “movement” as hostility to Southern and Eastern [in that order] Europeans), for some “leaders” Nordicism is mixed with Judeophilia or Oriental worship or an Aryan fetishism that imagines racial comrades in Iran and India.  As an example of the latter was the bizarre Alt Right infatuation with Jorjani.  Apparently Jorjani, subject to ethnoracial insults only a fraction of that experience by the typical “movement Euro-swarthoid” has broken with the Alt Right.  Read (emphasis added):

I hereby resign, effective immediately, from the Alt-Right Corporation that I co-founded and from my position as the Editor-in-Chief of Arktos Media. Of course, I remain a shareholder in both companies and, upon my return home to New York, I will enter into what I hope will be a brief buyout negotiation with my partners Richard Spencer and Daniel Friberg so that the shares I hold may remain within the movement’s leadership. (I am currently in San Francisco, for a private meeting concerning research and development of exotic technology that may someday serve the Iranian Air Force.) It should be added that, from now on, former associates within the Alt-Right movement of Europe and North America ought to consider any interactions with me as diplomatic relations with a representative of the coming post-Islamic political order of Iran and the wider Persianate world. This point cannot be overemphasized. Over the next few years, we will be watching with a hawk’s eye to identify the true friends and enemies of our archeo-futurist Iran.

And read (emphasis added):

What is worse is that in the long months of the Spring of 2017, as I waited for funding to materialize, I watched the corporation that was my brainchild turn into a magnet for white trash…The comments sections of our website devolved into a cesspool filled by the most despicable pond scum, former 4-chaners who would routinely pile on in trolling attacks against me every time I published something with a bit of intellectual content. “Iranians is brown poo-poo people” kind of sums it up. I decided to stop contributing until the investment came in and I could really clean things up…In May, at a meeting in London, I was assured by the investors that the obstacles had at last been cleared and I could expect our collaboration to begin in June. When I reported this to Richard at a New York lunch at the end of the same month, he thoughtlessly and angrily dismissed a plan that the investors had shared with me for creating an economic and security corridor from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea and across to the Caucasus. This “Neo-Scythian” Ukraine-based approach to the long-term revitalization and liberation of Europe – linked to a future, post-Islamic Greater Iran via the Caucasus – offended the Russophilia that has been fostered by his wife.

Comment on that is superfluous, other than to note, for the edification of third party observers, that this is the fellow elevated by the Alt Right to a position high in their councils, and who was turned on by the “movement” base only because of his obsessive harping about the greater glories of “archeo-futurist Iran.”  The Alt Right is the lowest sewer of the “movement,” it is a curse on racial nationalism, and anyone who thought it a good idea to give this Jorjani any sort of “movement” forum has, in my opinion, advertised their abysmal lack of good judgement for all to see.

I could say: I told you so.  So I will: I told you so. Check the “Jorjani” archives at this blog for proof of that.

Accountability?  None.  “Movement” leadership admitting gross negligence? Don’t make me laugh. Change?  Don’t expect it. 

Ultimately, it is the rank-and-file of the “movement” who are responsible for this. They can change the “movement,” alter its culture and eschew its obsessions, end its affirmative action program, and force accountability for leadership.  All they need to do is “vote with their feet” (or with their computers, for the digitally inclined, which is the vast majority these days). Gravitate to different leadership, visit different blogs and websites, and donate in other directions.  Will they do so?  For the most part no, for they share these same obsessions, fetishes, and fossilized dogmas as the leadership they so slavishly follow…right off the cliff.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

Spencer Video: 9/20/17

Good video.


I agree, petty nationalist ethnonationalism is a zero sum game, and ethnonationalists really do not understand how their vaunted “sovereignty” is guaranteed by other, larger powers.  In a future ethnonationalist Europe, who will guarantee the sovereignty of, say, Estonia?  Yes, I guess Estonia could develop their own little nuclear arsenal (*), but, really, the existence of an ethnonationalist Estonia would be guaranteed by whatever security arrangements exist among European states, which means they would give up some sovereignty for a collective defense arrangement.

Also, Spencer’s overall take on foreign affairs is simply good common sense.  It’s a shame Spencer is wasting himself with the Pepian Alt Right jackasses.

*Actually a good idea.  I’m a pro-proliferationist.  More nuclear weapons – at least in the hands of sane states – can help keep the peace.  And each nation that has such weapons should be upgrading, not downsizing.  The American trend of fewer such weapons, and smaller yields (no, against extreme hardened targets or large “soft” targets, “improved accuracy” cannot compensate for popgun sized yields), is madness.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Der Movement in Der News, 9/19/17

Dumb and useless Right.


That folks are willing throw away money on an execrable piece of filth like Derbyshire tells you all you need to know about why Whites are in steep decline.  If you are going to donate, give to Counter-Currents, for example. It’s clear I disagree with them strongly on some issues, but at least it is a pro-White, intellectually sound site.  Derbyshire is the opposite of that.

Yeah, Trump “resisted” – the far-left, White-hating, cuck buffoon signed it, didn’t he? Yegads, the delusional Trump worship on the Right knows no bounds.  Trump can make a speech announcing that there are too many Whites in America and that he’s sending out death squads to cull the White herd, and the fanboys will mumble about “4-D chess” and how Trump is nobly “resisting” pressure, since after all, he’s only going to kill most White Americans, not all of them.  The lickspittle Trumpism from the Right does nothing but continue to discredit our cause. 

Truth be told, many on the Right are more concerned with defending their majestically obese hero Trump than with defending their own ethnic genetic interests.  Truth be told, if Obama had signed this resolution, the usual suspects would be screaming “White genocide.”  Truth be told, continued Trump worship goes beyond bad judgment and now delves into the realm of some sort of sick masochistic homoerotic obsession.

What’s the Alt Right going to do?  The fundamental basis of its entire ideology is under attack.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, September 18, 2017

Frank Salter YouTube Videos

Informative watching.

Labels: ,

Sunday, September 17, 2017

A Lack of Self Awareness

Something is missing.

This is a good podcast as far as it goes, particularly with respect to the DACA fiasco.

But something is missing.  I did not hear the comment: “We here were naïve about Trump, we exhibited poor judgment, we were wrong and others who long ago identified the truth about Trump were right.”

But, no, they cannot do that.  But let me ask one question to the readers here. Some of the readers of EGI Notes are, I assume, also readers of Amren (and other standard “movement” sites).  So, the question to you, dear readers, is this: Which site, months before the election, correctly identified Trump as an unworthy buffoon and beta race cuck; and which enthusiastically pro-Trump site told you that Trump was “the last hope for White America?”

You know the answer to that, don’t you?  You also know that you – and by “you” I mean the “movement” rank-and-file – will do nothing about it, and will continue to support a leadership that has let you down time and time again.

Truth be told, many years ago, the Legion Europa project attempted to reason with the “movement.”  Years ago, when I was interviewed by Robert Griffin for his book, I outlined the types of activities that racial activists can do – centered around those that look to the Legionary movement for inspiration and/or those also centered around community activism – to actually make a difference.  What happened?  The Legion Europa project was either ignored or attacked; the advice in Griffin’s book went for nothing, as if I was speaking to the wind. The “movement” did not like the message, no, actually, the “movement” did not like the messenger, so it was all for nothing.

And old saying: “Every nation gets the leadership it deserves”  The same applies to racial activists – all of you get the leadership you deserve.  And now, the American “movement” sits around and scratches its collective (empty) head and wonders how they got fooled once again by a false “man on white horse” hero.

And so, the “movement” talks about “pattern recognition” – without recognizing the patterns inherent in its own failures.

Can you recognize any patterns?  Good luck with that.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,